I thought that the topic for this year’s Brown Symposium was pretty interesting. Sadly, the conference’s bite was not as big as it’s bark. The second conference was so so so boring. While the idea of how God affects your brain was an interesting proposition, the research presented was lacking in significance, in my opinion, and the speaker was, to say the least, incredibly monotonous. The speaker presented images of a brain “on” God, and “off” God, and showed the changes that occurred. The changes were minimal to my eye at least, and the hidden brain the speaker pointed out in “The Creation of Adam” did not sway me. Though the idea of the evidence presented was compelling, I didn’t really see the purpose of deducing how God affects the brain. Sure, the idea of a positive God over a negative one may be beneficial for mental happiness, but one isn’t going to adapt something as personal as religion to a scientific study. I don’t think that science has any place in advising people what or what not to believe. It’s an interesting study, but fairly invasive into one of the most personal aspects of a person’s life. Most people’s definition of their religion, or spirituality, is not something that can fit neatly into predetermined categories that then can be measured according to their positive or negative effects. Additionally, one of the best parts of a religion or spirituality is its mystery. By reducing the positive feeling that stems from religion to merely a chemical reaction in the brain, the part of religion that encourages faith, and through that everything else, is stymied.
The first lecture was abvit more interesting; it revolved around the many faces of God. I was astounded by the statistic that 88% of people believe in some God. Our country has always been religiously influenced, so I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised. The breakdown of that number into smaller categories of specific religions would probably highlight the strong Christian influences in our country.
Overall, I thought the conference didn’t deliver, but they were also working with a very difficult topic. Reconciling religion and science has been a challenge of people for centuries, and I don’t think there will ever be a way to fully integrate the two, nor would I want too much science interfering in my spirituality.